The
definition of Marxism is apt – and so pervasive (with its seven stages of
development) that it could, perhaps does, apply to all possible manifestations
of culture.
Whether
by supporters or detractors, Marxism is also usually associated with fervent
idealism, idealism that often has an aspect of negativity attached to it. It seems
to lead to pessimism, making one feel that whatever cultural manifestation
might eventually present itself, Marxism would label it doomed, and by
extension, humanity, as well.
In
comparison to Marxism is capitalism that in its description alone at times
seems to a glimmer of hope in the form of the prospect of self-autonomy.
Capitalism lurks behind the belief that the ‘big success’ could happen to you,
too. This perspective views Marxism and capitalism through the narrow prism of
economic individuality.
From an
artistic perspective, Marxism offers individuals the hope of escaping the
stifling blanket of hegemony, only to face the dangers of being labelled ‘counter
culture’ (Norton 2001: 14). It is flexibility that seems in short supply in
Marxism.
Deleuze
and Gauttari have earned their place in literature for their criticism of Freud.
He based, they say, the nuclear family on the patriarchal structure (ibid: 17)
of a man in charge and a woman at home under his thumb – as though this were
natural and not man-made.
Bibliography
Leitch,
Vincent B. et al. 2001.
Marxism.
In: The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism.
New
York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.
No comments:
Post a Comment